Home  |  What's New  |  Features  |  Gallery  |  Reviews  |  Reference  |  Forum  |  Search

F/A-18E Super Hornet

 

Revell, 1/48 scale

 

S u m m a r y

Catalogue Number and Description: 85-5519 ‘F/A-18E Super Hornet’
Scale: 1/48
Price: USD$18.46 available online from Squadron.com
Contents and Media 155+ parts on eleven separate standard grey trees and one clear tree. One water slide decal sheet featuring one high and one low-viz aircrafts from VF-14 “Tophatters”.
Review Type: FirstLook
Advantages: A long anticipated kit. Finely executed surface and interior details, and comes with a decent selection of external stores. Very good value for a lot of very decent plastic.
Disadvantages: Molding quality notably inferior than other recent Revell offerings. Presence of sink marks and flash are noted as are slightly soft and inconsistent surface details. Parts break down may induce fit issues. Fictitious details and awkward short cuts may need to be addressed.
Recommendation: Highly Recommended

 

Reviewed by John Chung


Revell's 1/48 scale F/A-18E Super Hornet is available online from Squadron

 

Introduction

 

Reviewer's Disclaimer

It is my humble intend to provide an informative observation of the kit as-is without sugarcoating or unrestrained bashing. I hope I may provide an accurate, unbiased insight into the positives and negatives of this kit.


There is plenty of information regarding the development and variants of the F/A-18 hornet so I will not elaborate further. For more information just google or yahoo around the net and knock yourself out.

Prior to this release Italeri had the sole 1/48 F/A-18E/F which was known for numerous inaccuracies and notorious fits. The Revell kit was eagerly anticipated since its announcement, and when I heard it’s out I promptly ordered one with my local shop. It’s worth mentioning that Hasegawa will also release its own tooling of the ‘Rhinos’ later this summer.

 

 

FirstLook



This kit has every look and feel of a legacy Monogram kit with recessed panel lines, a surprise given the high fidelity of recent Revell efforts. This has a lot to do with it being tooled in China instead of Korea, unlike the F-15E and F-86D kits. It therefore has slightly softer and inconsistent detailing, and the surface finish slightly pebbly. Nevertheless adequately fine detailing is present in the form of recessed panel lines and subtle rivets – lots of them. My copy has numerous evidences of flash and it’s said the magnitude of this issue varies by kit. Very little ejector pin marks are will need addressing and they’ll mostly be hidden once the kit is assembled. Inconsistent molding are apparent such as the lower fuselage recessed details around the nose gear well where once side is noticeably shallower than the other.

 

 

The molded-on Revell Monogram copyright relief on the starboard flap underneath is a bit cheesy.

 



The main fuselage is split horizontally and includes the inboard main wings molded together, eliminating problematic wing-fuselage joint and alignment issues. An issue pointed out by Mike Valdez is the forward avionics bay hinges on the lower fuselage halves which consist of a step in the plastic. This is understandable as undercuts would have made molding difficult as apparent on the 1/48 Hasegawa hornets. However it is a definite step down from the very elegantly done hinges on the separate nose halves.

 

 

Personally, it’s perfectly legitimate for the exclusion of separate flaps, as the nature of fowler flap mechanism makes it difficult to replicate in scale plastic. To this date only the 1/48 Hasegawa and 1/32 Academy kits have ever attempted this feature. It’s a bit of a disappointment that a typical parked configuration is impossible OOB, but it’s not difficult to modify the flaps either. Be aware that the fowler mechanism requires a lot more than just simple scoring and bending should you attempt the modifications. I have written an article on this as posted on ARC. http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/tnt1/101-200/tnt114_F-18Flaps_Chung/tnt114.htm

The forward fuselage is split into four pieces with two vertical halves and an insert each for top and bottom. This allows consistent molding but the fit will definitely be an issues. There are what initially seem to be sink marks on the vertical pieces. A quick consultation with the instructions seems they are intentional but in reality shouldn’t be there and will need filling and rescribing. A boarding ladder is provided with intricate molding on the ladder and in the bay, tho the ladder seems to be on the thick side and a tad narrow looking.

A decent cockpit is provided with simple sidewall and side console relief. It’s interesting to note the sidewall detail for the aft cockpit is present, evidence that an F/A-18F may follow in the future. The main instrument panel is particularly well executed, right down to the individual MFD buttons. The instrument coaming is sadly nothing short of fictitious, and the cheesy attempt to duplicate the double glass HUD assembly as one thick lump resulted in a gaping hole in the middle to prevent sink marks. The aft cockpit decking is exquisite and will shine once painted and dry-brushed. The control stick and throttle are separate but their details are okay. The SJU-17 NACES ejection seat comes complete with very nicely done surface textures and harnesses. However, the seat does look a tad too boxy, and does not come with any detail on the back of the seat, which will be partially visible.

The undercarriages are well executed with exquisite and busy-looking main undercarriage wells, which also have curved roofs and correct depth! The nose well seems a bit shallow but similarly adequate. A number of gear doors are molded with sidewall, a little annoying but allows proper detailing of the well walls. The undercarriages are decent with separate add-ons and molded-on plumbing. A slight drawback is the main legs being one-piece affairs that don’t allow knee joint details, but provides the necessary structural integrity. I’m disappointed at the wheels, which the main are passable and nicely weighted but the nose rims are too small and generic and the tires too square-looking.

I am particularly impressed by the inclusion of canopy frame details, and the canopy itself is blown with the properly done cross section which has a mold line down the centre. The forward windscreen is molded with a section of the fuselage panel, which I prefer as it reduces the risk of damaging the canopy if blending into the fuselage is necessary.

 

 

The vertical stabs have plenty but subtly executed rivet details that should look fine with a couple coats of primer and paint. I must point out that their leading and trailing edges are too thick and have weird beveling on both the leading and trailing edges. Coupled with the molded on details it will be difficult to thin them down and correct this issue.

The horizontal stabs are separate and attach via a moveable connection inside the main fuselage halves. This particular feature may prevent breakage to the stabs of they’re hit and to some degree attractive for the kids, it drastically undersized the “burner cans” by reducing its available reach into the aft fuselage. In the photo comparison you can see the exhaust is smaller than either the 1/48 Hasegawa and Monogram Legacy hornets. Similarly, the interior of the converging-diverging nozzle became too small which may be the reason for the deep sink mark that trenches the entire nozzle interior. This is an unexpected fallback as both the Rafale and F-15E have outstanding exhausts.

 



Likewise, the intake is a mixed blessing consisting of a complete trunk and fan face that goes only about a third its proper length. In reality the trunks end at the aft bulkhead of the main wheel wells, that’s why the well roofs are curved being the bottom of the trunks. Revell’s trunks end at just before where the wells start, which is better than no trunks but still they did provide full trunks for the F-15E. Ejector pin marks inside the trunks will need cleaning up as I’m sure the fit of the trunk to intake lips.

 

 

A decent selection of external stores is provided, most of which have never been tooled in 1/48. Included are 2 x AIM-120C, 2 x AIM-9Xs, 2 x GBU-31-4B JDAM, 2 x Mk.83, 1 x AN/ASQ-228 FLIR pod, and 1 x external tank. The weapons themselves are nicely done but detail could have been a bit sharper. The missiles have separate electrical conduits that need to be attached. The bombs have US Navy fire resistant coatings and separate fins. Would be nice if more than one external tank is provided tho.



 

Conclusion

 

This kit is not perfect and does have its share of issues, none of which are major and with a bit of basic modeling skills can easily be overcome. There are also inaccuracies and ‘short cuts’ that could have been done better, leaving the more “authenticity-zealous” rooms to improve.

That this kit was not tooled in Korea but in China accounts for the slightly degraded engineering and molding quality. Personally I wouldn’t mind paying another $5-$10 for a better quality R&D and tooling that would give Tamigawa a serious run for their money. Nonetheless this kit is extremely well done, of unbeatable value, and more than worth the delays we have waited. It also gives a glimpse into the future of the model industry as China continues to rapidly improve their injection molding technology. Perhaps we’ll soon be able to see affordable quality products once again, ones that will please the serious modeler and be affordable to the kid around the block.

Oh, and clear up some shelve space, this is one serious-size airplane!

Highly Recommended.


Sample purchased with reviewer's funds

 

 

Additional Images

 

Click the thumbnails below to view larger images:


Review Copyright © 2005 by John Chung
Page Created 18 July, 2005
Last updated 17 July, 2005

Back to HyperScale Main Page

Back to Reviews Page